QA

15th February 2008 at 00:00
Q: How interested do you think Ofsted will be if a reception classroom looks slightly less bright and inviting than a nursery in the same school?

A: Schools sometimes worry unduly about displays; certainly inspectors don't expect walls to be adorned and decorated for their benefit. Having said that, creating a stimulating environment for the children is usually considered to be an important feature of foundation stage provision. If you are contrasting the reception classroom unfavourably with your nursery, then I dare say parents and children are doing the same, and inspectors may raise concerns.

Q: We have just had our inspection and a member of staff who was observed was told that the lesson had been good with outstanding elements.

However, when the teacher asked for developmental areas in order to improve, the inspector said there were none. The inspector said that as a non specialist in the subject he was observing, he was unable to give an outstanding grade, hence the judgement.

I know that this is not the case, not least because elsewhere, a non-subject-specialist did award outstanding to a lesson. So is this informal advice, old advice or simply incorrect? We are not going to challenge, query or appeal against verbal feedback in this one aspect, as it had no impact upon overall judgements, but I am curious about the principle involved.

A: Oh dear. I think from this account that the inspector is lucky that you are not seeking to complain. Where inspectors give feedback on a lesson and it is graded other than outstanding, they should always identify how it could be better. Indeed, even outstanding lessons might have a point for improvement because outstanding does not mean perfect.

It is not acceptable for inspectors to downgrade judgements simply because they are observing lessons outside their comfort zone. On ordinary inspections, they are not in school as subject specialists and are expected to be able to collect evidence across all subjects.

I suppose in this case that no harm was done, as it didn't affect overall judgements, but teachers should certainly be prepared to challenge inspectors who grade a lesson as good or satisfactory, but are unable to explain why.

Selwyn Ward draws on years of inspection experience. The views expressed here are his own. To ask him a question, contact him at askaninspector@tes.co.uk

Selwyn regularly answers your Ofsted questions on our forums at www.tes.co.ukstaffroominspection.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now