5th November 2004 at 00:00

Some children are programmed to assume that "science has disproved the Bible" about creation. Underneath this is another assumption, that either we choose science or religion. The neat answer that RE teachers used to give, that science deals with the "How?" and religion deals with the "Why?"

is rather too neat. But these matters can be teased out for discussion and are likely to recur.

The book of Genesis has two creation accounts, 1.1 to 2.4 and 2.5 to 2.25, which happily contradict each other on the detail, but converge strongly on the faith statement that the universe is here because God wills it to be.

What came before the Big Bang? Classes can discuss the possibility that God was there - and the danger that by slotting God into a gap in human knowledge, we may just be creating another place where God can be pushed out when knowledge creeps forward a bit further. Today's scientific so-called proof for God may be tomorrow's agnosticism.

The Hebrew Psalms recall the realities that can't be touched and the feelings that the universe can inspire. Psalms 8, 19.1 to 6, 24 1 and 2, and 74.12 to 17 provide good examples for this. Students could then write a psalm for the world of the microscope or the Big Bang.

Terence Copley

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today