RE does not teach morality

7th July 2006 at 01:00
Church leaders and inspectors should be aware that, although a daily act of worship in state schools (I have conducted many) is a legal requirement, it should not be confused with moral education. You don't have to be religious in order to be moral, and it is doubtful whether religious behaviour is moral behaviour. And the Department for Education and Skills should be aware that religious education is not an instrument for making people either religious or moral; its purpose is educational. There's some woolly thinking going on in high places.

John A Sealey

(Doctor of Divinity, ex-chief examiner for religious education and author of Religious Education (Unwin) and Religion in Schools (Gleerup)



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today