RE is not the same as worship

14th May 2004 at 01:00
In David Bell's article (TES, April 23) unnecessary and ill-informed references are made to religious education and the new non-statutory national framework, none of which has any significant relationship to collective worship.

Why is it so difficult to understand the difference between a curriculum subject (RE) and an activity (collective worship) which is outside the curriculum?

Is this yet another opportunity to fuel a potential controversy like the so-called row about whether pupils should be taught about atheism in RE lessons?

This row manufactured by the media in February, was based on inaccurate assumptions. The framework has not been substantially rewritten but has simply been through a process of drafting and consultation. It is now in the public domain.

Collective worship is another matter altogether and needs to be the subject of informed debate.

Julie Grove Chair, Association of RE inspectors, advisers and consultants 39 Swarthmore Road, Birmingham

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now