Recipe for tears

12th September 2003 at 01:00
My school has a roll of just under 900 pupils and it offers a huge range of courses and subjects - all headed by principal teachers.

When the job-sizing exercise first came about, I thought it would result in principal teachers of big departments such as maths, English and modern languages being awarded more.

This, according to your issue of August 22, is what the Executive insists too. However, it is definitely not the case. I know for certain that our principal teacher of home economics was job-sized at point 4 of the new scale, the same as the principal teacher of maths and the same as me.

Yet in home economics the department presented approximately 45 candidates for examinations. In modern languages we presented 176 candidates. The number of staff in the departments I have compared would also indicate that maths and modern languages should have a bigger weighting but this does not seem to have had any bearing.

I am at a loss to understand how the job-sizing exercise can have any credibility.

Principal Teacher

modern languages

(Name and address supplied)

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now