Recovery at Reading

13th November 1998 at 00:00
The article headed "Training courses go after poor inspections" (TES, October 30) gave a wholly wrong and inaccurate impression of the position with regard to our primary initial teacher-training courses at Reading University.

Our primary postgraduate certificate in education course was inspected last year and there is a non-compliance issue involved.

Owing to prompt action and the production of a positive recovery plan, however, the withdrawal of accreditation procedure is not being activated by the Teacher Training Agency. In last year's inspection of 14 areas seen, only one, in the area of reading, was judged non-compliant and half were judged "good".

You also referred inaccurately to the Office for Standards in Education's inspection of our PGCE primary course as having criticised the "standards of literacy and numeracy among students". OFSTED's inspection assessed our trainees on their teaching of reading and number not their personal literacy and numeracy.

Roger Williams, The University of Reading Reading

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now