Rectify pension oversight

14th January 2005 at 00:00
The consultation document Modernisation of the Teachers' Pension Scheme proposes to change the 180th system to a 160th system. This seems good as a new entrant to the profession can accumulate a full pension entitlement in just 30 years' service. Fantastic, because 40 years in the classroom is simply not possible for most teachers: we are worn out well before then.

I am 47 years old and have been teaching for 22 years. I understand that I am expected to work until I am 62.5 years old before I will be able to draw a full pension. With the added years already purchased, I would have made a total of 42.5 years worth of contributions.

Not only will I have paid 12.5 years more contributions (10 if they stop at age 60) than a new entrant, but I will also suffer a fall in the number of benefits the current scheme offers, particularly enhancement and an early pension if I retire early due to moderate ill-health.

This must be an oversight which shows the need for a fairer means of transfer to the revised scheme for longer-term members.

Hugh Strafford Tipsy House Drunken Drove Great Massingham, Norfolk

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now