Rectify pension oversight

14th January 2005 at 00:00
The consultation document Modernisation of the Teachers' Pension Scheme proposes to change the 180th system to a 160th system. This seems good as a new entrant to the profession can accumulate a full pension entitlement in just 30 years' service. Fantastic, because 40 years in the classroom is simply not possible for most teachers: we are worn out well before then.

I am 47 years old and have been teaching for 22 years. I understand that I am expected to work until I am 62.5 years old before I will be able to draw a full pension. With the added years already purchased, I would have made a total of 42.5 years worth of contributions.

Not only will I have paid 12.5 years more contributions (10 if they stop at age 60) than a new entrant, but I will also suffer a fall in the number of benefits the current scheme offers, particularly enhancement and an early pension if I retire early due to moderate ill-health.

This must be an oversight which shows the need for a fairer means of transfer to the revised scheme for longer-term members.

Hugh Strafford Tipsy House Drunken Drove Great Massingham, Norfolk

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today