Red carpet for head, red card from Ofsted

26th January 2007 at 00:00
School feted by ministers for big improvements is told to pull its socks up by inspectors

A school praised by the Government for being one of the most improved in the country is failing its pupils according to Ofsted inspectors. Cockburn College of Arts, in Leeds, is involved in a bitter dispute with the school standards watchdog after inspectors judged it to be sub-standard and issued it a "notice to improve".

But while the school waits for its appeal verdict, it has been invited to two receptions to celebrate its achievements - one attended by Alan Johnson, the Education Secretary, and the other featuring Christine Gilbert, the head of Ofsted, as its guest of honour.

Inspectors, who visited in November, were heavily critical of pupil attainment, describing it as "exceptionally low" and among the worst in the country. But the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust has praised Cockburn for boosting its results over the past three years and admitted it to its "most improved club".

Colin Richardson, the headteacher, was invited to a trust drinks reception with Mr Johnson earlier this week and to a formal celebration dinner with Ms Gilbert next month.

In March last year, Jacqui Smith, then schools minister, wrote to the school to applaud its achievement as the ninth most improved in the country for key stage three.

"It's a travesty of justice," said Mr Richardson, who has been headteacher for 14 years. "The whole situation is just crackers. How can we be both one of the most improved schools in the country and then be given a notice to improve? We are already on an upward trend. Results are improving year after year."

Mr Richardson is critical of the inspectors, whom he says had made up their mind beforehand.

"On the first morning, the lead inspector said that... we would either be put in special measures or given a notice to improve," said Mr Richardson.

"That was before she knew anything about the school apart from some data."

He said the inspectors had reached their decision based on the school's contextual value added (CVA) scores for 2001 to 2005, which measure pupils'

progress while taking into account their educational and social backgrounds. Although inspectors are supposed to refer to the scores, Ofsted's guidelines require that they make up only part of the overall judgment.

The school considered taking the case to judicial review, but decided against because it would cost pound;25,000. A first appeal backed the inspectors' findings but the verdict of a second is awaited.

Mr Richardson believes the appeal process was stacked against the school because staff were not allowed to meet those investigating the complaint.

An Ofsted spokeswoman said: "It would not be right for us to comment publicly on a complaint we're still investigating."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today