Registration scheme suspended

2nd July 2010 at 01:00
Heads' unions join demands for overhaul as home secretary brands vetting checks `disproportionate'

Heads' leaders in England have called for a major review of safeguarding rules in schools, following the surprise suspension of the controversial vetting and barring scheme south of the border.

In one of its early acts, the Westminster Government has "halted" the registration system so it can be scaled back to "proportionate, common sense levels", English Home Secretary Theresa May said.

She said the scheme, due to start on July 26, is "disproportionate and overly burdensome, and that it unduly infringes on civil liberties".

It is understood that the suspension of the scheme will run for three months, and the scaling back will mean that school volunteers will not have to register with the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA).

Heads' unions have long criticised the bureaucracy and cost associated with vetting and barring. The ISA checks would have cost pound;36 per person, but some authorities were planning to charge a pound;44 administration fee. Estimated costs would have totalled pound;30,000 for every school.

Earlier this year, the seven associations representing teachers in England and Wales warned that the new vetting and barring scheme could spell the end of many extra-curricular activities and trips and leave heads drowning in paperwork.

Mrs May said while the safety of children and vulnerable adults was of paramount importance, "it is vital we take a measured approach".

Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said safeguarding was a "dog's dinner" because of the amount of multiple checks required.

Malcolm Trobe, policy director of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: "We all want appropriate safeguarding procedures, but vetting and barring was going overboard. We need to reconsider."

But Anne Orton, safeguarding divisional manager with Ofsted, urged caution: "I would have serious reservations if volunteers were not included. Schools are safe but, if those checks are not in place, unsafe people might gravitate towards them. We need a realistic and proportionate approach. There also need to be whistleblowing procedures."

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now