The relative success of comprehensives compared with grammar schools

30th January 2004 at 00:00
* The relative success of comprehensives compared with grammar schools in the KS4 value-added tables does nothing to prove that they are better. The best you can say is that they have recovered the ground lost in KS3.

However, there is a bigger factor operating to the grammars' disadvantage.

The best a pupil can hope to get is an A*, so success at KS3 automatically limits their KS4 improvement. Furthermore, an A* at GCSE corresponds to a B at GCE, which was good, but hardly exceptional. There is no reason to suppose that present-day grammar schools could not educate their pupils to these standards if we had an exam system that could demonstrate it.

John Duffield

64 Spring Grove

Loughton, Essex

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now