Restraint with compassion

20th September 2013 at 01:00

The debate concerning the use of restraint ("Can schools justify the use of physical force?", Professional, 6 September) is complex in terms of ethics, motives and long-term outcomes.

I worked previously as head of education at a centre for students with extreme autism, very challenging behaviour and significant learning difficulties. Secure restraint was not a punishment but part of an agreed programme of positive change that reduced the risk of adverse behaviour and self harm. It was used to protect the student, their peers and staff, and was closely monitored, debated and assessed. During my tenure, the team had 100 per cent success in reintegrating students into specialist provision units.

What is harder to measure is the emotional and physical damage to staff who dedicate their careers to these deserving learners when using approved techniques with compassion and diligence.

Dr Len Parkyn, Horam, East Sussex.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today