Right to resist early starting age

28th May 2010 at 01:00

Tess Robson and the parents in her school are right to be concerned about a September start to reception for summer-born children ("Parents back starting-age revolt", May 21).

Even Sir Jim Rose, who advocated this policy, acknowledged that research shows that the youngest reception children are likely to be seen as "less able" than their older peers and may even be deemed to have special educational needs. Boys and children learning English as an additional language are particularly vulnerable to this labelling. Maintained nursery schools, a huge majority of which have been judged to be good or outstanding by Ofsted, offer staffing ratios, environments and a curriculum that are ideal for three to five-year-olds. Parents whose child is lucky enough to have a place in one are wise to keep this place for as long as possible.

Margaret Edgington, Vice president of The National Campaign for Real Nursery Education, Leicester.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today