Risks of assault

2nd February 1996 at 00:00
Teachers are increasingly worried about the possibility of assaults in school by parents and sometimes by pupils. They properly look to the management of school, and ultimately to the employers themselves, for adequate support and protection. Where this is seen to be inadequate teachers may wish to leave the premises, thus risking dismissal for breach of contract.

In Dutton and Clark Ltd versus Daly (1985), an employee of a travel agency was given the corner of the shop in which to set up an agency of a building society. The employer partitioned off this section and erected a bullet proof screen and counter and installed a dummy video camera with an adjacent notice warning that it was in constant use. The employee also had the protection of warning buttons fitted to the counter, connecting with the travel agency area.

Despite all these precautions, the building society section was robbed twice by gunmen over a very short period. The travel agent would not spend any more money on extra safety precautions as they were not justified in relation to the building society agency takings. The police agreed with this.

However, Mrs Daly was so shaken by the incidents that she needed time off work. Not long after her return two "suspicious" men came into her section causing her great anxiety. Although they turned out to be newspaper reporters she felt she had to leave work. She claimed unfair dismissal compensation on the ground that she had been constructively dismissed.

The industrial tribunal agreed with her but the Employment Appeal Tribunal reversed the decision, laying down two principles.

Firstly, the test of whether an employer is in breach of contract is whether the employer's actions are outside the range of reasonable conduct that anyone would expect of a reasonable employer. Secondly, industrial tribunals must apply this "objective" test and not their own opinion of what the employer should have done.

Since August 1993 the question of dismissal in such circumstances comes under a new section 57A of the Employment Protection (consolidation) Act 1978, which provides that a dismissal is automatically unfair where an employee reasonably believed there was a risk of serious and imminent danger, or had brought to the attention of the employer circumstances which he reasonably believed were harmful to health and safety.

Chris Lowe is honorary legal adviser to the Secondary Heads Association

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today