Risks of assault

2nd February 1996 at 00:00
Teachers are increasingly worried about the possibility of assaults in school by parents and sometimes by pupils. They properly look to the management of school, and ultimately to the employers themselves, for adequate support and protection. Where this is seen to be inadequate teachers may wish to leave the premises, thus risking dismissal for breach of contract.

In Dutton and Clark Ltd versus Daly (1985), an employee of a travel agency was given the corner of the shop in which to set up an agency of a building society. The employer partitioned off this section and erected a bullet proof screen and counter and installed a dummy video camera with an adjacent notice warning that it was in constant use. The employee also had the protection of warning buttons fitted to the counter, connecting with the travel agency area.

Despite all these precautions, the building society section was robbed twice by gunmen over a very short period. The travel agent would not spend any more money on extra safety precautions as they were not justified in relation to the building society agency takings. The police agreed with this.

However, Mrs Daly was so shaken by the incidents that she needed time off work. Not long after her return two "suspicious" men came into her section causing her great anxiety. Although they turned out to be newspaper reporters she felt she had to leave work. She claimed unfair dismissal compensation on the ground that she had been constructively dismissed.

The industrial tribunal agreed with her but the Employment Appeal Tribunal reversed the decision, laying down two principles.

Firstly, the test of whether an employer is in breach of contract is whether the employer's actions are outside the range of reasonable conduct that anyone would expect of a reasonable employer. Secondly, industrial tribunals must apply this "objective" test and not their own opinion of what the employer should have done.

Since August 1993 the question of dismissal in such circumstances comes under a new section 57A of the Employment Protection (consolidation) Act 1978, which provides that a dismissal is automatically unfair where an employee reasonably believed there was a risk of serious and imminent danger, or had brought to the attention of the employer circumstances which he reasonably believed were harmful to health and safety.

Chris Lowe is honorary legal adviser to the Secondary Heads Association

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now