Rule on ties that binds

2nd July 2004 at 01:00
Last year an employment tribunal ruled a civil servant had been unfairly dismissed for refusing to wear a collar and tie. This has now been overturned by the Employment Appeal Tribunal and sent back to the original tribunal for reconsideration.

The claimant complained about a dress code which said men must dress in a "professional and businesslike way", with a collar and tie. Women had to "dress appropriately to a similar standard" but continued to wear T-shirts.

The tribunal said it was discriminatory for men to be required to wear particular clothing while women were not.

But the appeal concluded that this was the wrong approach. The tribunal should have asked whether men and women could only achieve equivalent smartness if men wore a collar and tie.

Further challenges to dress codes look set to be made, following the new regulations outlawing discrimination by sexual orientation and religion.

But schools which still believe in particular dress standards should not be deterred. They can impose a dress code on staff that is different for men and women. The trick is to ensure that the overall effect does not lead to less favourable treatment for one sex.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today