Satisfactory is not enough

5th September 2003 at 01:00
Schools could soon be failed by inspectors because their lessons are mostly satisfactory rather than good.

Inspectors have been told to label teaching in some schools unsatisfactory where lessons are judged to have been "generally satisfactory".

All inspectors must follow the guidance under Office for Standards in Education rules. Last year they graded teaching as satisfactory overall in 22 per cent of primary schools and 19 per cent of secondaries.

News of the move will be a shock for schools as Ofsted's 2003 inspection framework had been billed as the start of a "light-touch" regime. It follows controversial comments by David Bell, the chief inspector, over the value of lessons deemed satisfactory.

In his annual report earlier this year, he asked: "Is satisfactory (teaching) good enough given the demands of pupils and the rising expectations of wider society?"

John Bangs, head of education at the National Union of Teachers, has written to Mr Bell voicing concern. "It appears to demonstrate an Alice in Wonderland situation where the meaning of the word satisfactory is the reverse of its "original intention," he says in the letter. Nationally, the number of schools with pejorative Ofsted inspection reports could rise significantly."

John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said the guidance "makes a nonsense of the English language".

The guidance is printed in handbooks for inspectors visiting primary, secondary and special schools from the start of this term. It states:

"Teaching that is predominantly and consistently very good with some outstanding lessons may justify an overall judgment of excellence.

"On the other hand, teaching that is generally satisfactory with little that is better merits a judgment of unsatisfactory owing to the lack of aspiration in teaching."

Inspectors are told that an overall unsatisfactory judgment for teaching should, if it is accompanied by another "major weakness", result in a school being placed into special measures. Moreover, the guidance says that a single "major weakness" on its own could, if serious enough, lead to a school being condemned as failing.

Inspectors have already voiced concern to Mr Bangs about people being labelled failures when their performance was satisfactory. They were also worried that there was a push for more critical judgments.

An Ofsted spokeswoman said that judgments about overall teaching quality were not based on lesson observations alone and had to take into account other factors such as the quality of pupils' work.

"A school with a predominance of satisfactory teaching is in the minority," she said. "If, additionally, there is virtually no good or better teaching, then this is well below what is expected of a school. It is reasonable in such rare cases to say that the school's teaching is unsatisfactory overall."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today