Sats questioned

3rd August 2007 at 01:00
It is a trifle sad that your columnist Peter Greaves seeks to get us to approve of the purpose and function of Sats (TES, July 20).

While he makes some interesting points about objectivity, he seems also to have become over-embroiled, with the help of government prescription, in fully imbibing the politicians' message. In an educationist, this is close to being unforgivable.

It isn't just about how results are dealt with it is about the means of testing and assessing worthwhile knowledge, understanding and skills. Surely we still need to scrutinise what is included in tests that relate to these three key items in child- relevant ways. Hence, we have annual discussions on relevance and validity and long may they continue.

But let's not be as sadly assertive as Mr Greaves. For him to say "all education professionals (should) acknowledge the value Sats can have" is a terrible indictment from a working member of a senior management team. We have been warned.

Tim Peskett

Governor trainer and initial teacher trainer,


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today