'Scandal' in maths blamed on tiering

16th October 1998 at 01:00
THOUSANDS of 16-year-olds failed last summer's maths GCSE because their schools put them in for the wrong exam, according to a new analysis from Exeter University.

The failure rate doubled in maths, despite an upward trend in other subjects, and Professor David Burghes from Exeter University blames the Government's curriculum quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

He says that the QCA imposed a "bizarre" restriction which makes it harder to pass two of the three maths papers available.

This year, for the first time, D grade candidates failed if they attempted the most difficult, "higher tier" exam. Lowest pass or F grade candidates failed if they took a gamble on the "intermediate tier". Last year, they would have passed.

The Secondary Heads Assocation has also voiced its concern. Its new general secretary, John Dunford, has written to the QCA to complain.

Mr Dunford said: "It's something people didn't pick up in August. The tiering rules have caused large numbers of students who might have got a moderate grade to get no grade at all. It's crazy."

The pressure to enter candidates for the top tier (grades A*-C) has increased because it is the only one that registers in the national league table of results.

The QCA has launched an investigation into the changes, which were intended to produce a clear distinction between the three different levels of maths exam on offer. But it denies that the new "tiering" system accounts for the high failure rate.

Last summer saw an enormous rise in the number of failures in maths, with 35,000 students receiving no award. The percentage of failures more than doubled from 2.1 to 5.2 per cent.

Professor Burghes points out that the numbers getting unclassified marks increased by 3.1 percentage points. At the same time, the total getting the lowest pass grade Fs declined by 3 points.

"This would appear to be accounted for by candidates falling off the edge. That is, they were entered for the intermediate tier but failed to achieve a grade E. So they were awarded a grade U."

Professor Burghes said: "Most of these students can try again, but for many of them it is a real disaster. Indeed the word scandal comes to mind."

At the time, a number of theories were advanced for the decline, including the national shortage of skilled mathematics teachers.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today