Science and a subtle message;Letter

25th June 1999 at 01:00
We read about the Graduate Teacher Programme designed to increase the number of science teachers. We had a head of science who was keen to be involved, and is experienced in mentoring PGCE students from various partner university education departments.

So she rang Timeplan for details, but was somewhat taken aback to be told that we do not qualify: we do not teach physics, chemistry or biology as separate sciences; we do teach NEAB science. We don't teach A-level in the sixth form; we do teach GNVQ.

I wondered if it was because we are an upper (secondary modern) school. But when we advertised in The TES, we had 20 enquiries.

Is intention and realisation adrift here? Or am I missing some subtle message?

L J Smales Headteacher Burnham Upper School Burnham, Buckinghamshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today