Science and a subtle message;Letter

25th June 1999 at 01:00
We read about the Graduate Teacher Programme designed to increase the number of science teachers. We had a head of science who was keen to be involved, and is experienced in mentoring PGCE students from various partner university education departments.

So she rang Timeplan for details, but was somewhat taken aback to be told that we do not qualify: we do not teach physics, chemistry or biology as separate sciences; we do teach NEAB science. We don't teach A-level in the sixth form; we do teach GNVQ.

I wondered if it was because we are an upper (secondary modern) school. But when we advertised in The TES, we had 20 enquiries.

Is intention and realisation adrift here? Or am I missing some subtle message?

L J Smales Headteacher Burnham Upper School Burnham, Buckinghamshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now