Science reaches across the spectrum

28th March 2008 at 00:00

I was at a talk the other day where the speaker asked how many colours of the rainbow there were. The conventional answer is seven - red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet. Where, then, was crimson and turquoise?

We were reminded that Newton, the first to split white light into a spectrum using a prism, had a thing about the number seven and was determined to see seven colours. Personally, I don't think indigo pulls its weight. It's the chromatic equivalent of the planet Pluto (there were seven known planets in Newton's time) and needs to get the Weakest Link treatment.

How many sciences are there? The conventional answer in a Scottish school is three, though I once worked with a principal teacher who claimed that chemistry was "that small branch of physics concerned with radioactivity and the electrostatic interaction between atoms".

Lord Rutherford claimed that "in science, there is only physics; all the rest is stamp collecting". That was in the days when biology stopped at taxonomy. Or do I mean taxidermy? The subject certainly had a limited appeal for me due to the large number of facts I had to stuff into my head.

Just when I thought I had ammo for an attack on the overly enthusiastic way some teachers are willing to pigeonhole themselves as physicists, chemists and biologists, another talk came along. This was by a weel-kent earth scientist from Our Dynamic Earth in Edinburgh. His subject, he reckoned, was well placed to support the cross-curricular nature of A Curriculum for Excellence.

By way of an illustration, he had a slide with earth sciences as a kind of lintel atop three pillars labelled with the conventional three sciences. But what was this? The three pillars were red, blue and green, the primary colours that can be mixed to produce all the others.

The introduction of faculty systems has coincided with an increase in science teachers wishing to teach only their own discipline. Perhaps "coincided" is the wrong word. It implies that there is no causal relationship between the two events and this may not be the case. Is either of these developments a good thing, or is something a little off colour happening here? I'll come back to this another day when I've worked it out myself.

Meantime, imagine a world without yellow.

Gregor Steele associates a different colour with each physical concept, something that got him funny looks at a writers' group.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today