Science revisions so mad they could be work of a nutty professor

25th June 2010 at 01:00

In commenting on the Con-Lib Government's possible changes to the primary curriculum ("Fearful over curriculum revisions", Letters, June 18), your correspondents, members of the UK Literary Association, are right to be concerned, even though their "subject" is likely to be protected.

On an informed guess there will be only minor changes to English (yet more emphasis on phonics) and to mathematics (more demanding content in Years 5 and 6) but a major strengthening of the "established discipline" of Niall Ferguson-type history.

Whatever time is left will be "freed up" for schools to provide other components of a purported "broad and balanced" curriculum. Such a curriculum supposedly for the early 21st-century would not be a liberal one but it would be a con and an imperial (and imperious) one.

Professor Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now