Science revisions so mad they could be work of a nutty professor

25th June 2010 at 01:00

In commenting on the Con-Lib Government's possible changes to the primary curriculum ("Fearful over curriculum revisions", Letters, June 18), your correspondents, members of the UK Literary Association, are right to be concerned, even though their "subject" is likely to be protected.

On an informed guess there will be only minor changes to English (yet more emphasis on phonics) and to mathematics (more demanding content in Years 5 and 6) but a major strengthening of the "established discipline" of Niall Ferguson-type history.

Whatever time is left will be "freed up" for schools to provide other components of a purported "broad and balanced" curriculum. Such a curriculum supposedly for the early 21st-century would not be a liberal one but it would be a con and an imperial (and imperious) one.

Professor Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today