Selection is the best method to raise standards

12th November 2010 at 00:00

Your leader "Citizen Gove must suppress a revolution by those unfair and un-Tory grammars" (November 5) seems a bit of an over-reaction to the mere possibility that the schools may expand.

The argument weirdly asserts that grammars are not genuinely superior - they "merely" cater for the brightest. The fact is that those here dubbed mediocre still outshine most comprehensives at A-level, which means that selectivity caters better for the brightest than non-selectivity.

This principle is essential, especially through the secondary stage. It makes no sense to try to teach everyone at one average level. Standards are maintained at the top and, when these deteriorate, the lower levels are adversely affected, too.

A rigidly non-selective policy is the root cause of incessant problems in allocations to secondary schools. If all schools were permitted academically to select their intakes (and assess behaviour and commitment as well) this would have a greater effect in raising standards than any one of the measures that are continually tried to revolutionise the comprehensives.

Nigel Probert, Porthmadog.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today