SEN provision is a disgrace

24th September 2010 at 01:00

Joseph Lee's incisive article about the Ofsted SEN report confirmed what has been stated by parents, professionals and the students themselves for so many years.

We have had research into SEN and LLD provision going back to the 1990s. The result has been a declining service. It is not the fault of staff crushed by funding cuts, target-driven outcomes, time-limited programmes and stringent recruitment criteria.

Post-16 SEN provision is restricted in respect of access and content; post-19 provision in incorporated colleges is dire. There are beacons of excellence in FE. The private sector offers bespoke services, but they are costly. There are very few incorporated colleges that can fully meet learners' educational, medical, welfare and social needs. This is a national disgrace.

At a time of yet another review of education and associated services, we can at least hope for a positive response from central government.

Dr Len Parkyn, Independent SENLDD consultant, Vines Cross, East Sussex.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today