Send the inspector to a nursery

28th April 1995 at 01:00
As early-years specialists, we are concerned about Chris Woodhead's limited understanding of the benefits of nursery education (TES, April 7). His reported view that the evidence is less than conclusive clearly contradicts recent prestigious reports which highlight the value of high quality early education, both in its own right and as an investment for the future.

The report by the National Commission on Education explicitly states that the available evidence is "convincing". This is endorsed by the authors of the RSA Start Right report who are "convinced that there is sufficient research evidence to show clearly the value of early education". How much more evidence does the Chief Inspector need? As the House of Commons Select Committee says, "no other phase of education has been required to give such proof of its value".

We suggest that, as a matter of urgency, Chris Woodhead familiarises himself with the evidence available in order to make a more valid contribution to the current debate about the education of the under-fives.



The Early Years Curriculum Group

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today