Send the inspector to a nursery

28th April 1995 at 01:00
As early-years specialists, we are concerned about Chris Woodhead's limited understanding of the benefits of nursery education (TES, April 7). His reported view that the evidence is less than conclusive clearly contradicts recent prestigious reports which highlight the value of high quality early education, both in its own right and as an investment for the future.

The report by the National Commission on Education explicitly states that the available evidence is "convincing". This is endorsed by the authors of the RSA Start Right report who are "convinced that there is sufficient research evidence to show clearly the value of early education". How much more evidence does the Chief Inspector need? As the House of Commons Select Committee says, "no other phase of education has been required to give such proof of its value".

We suggest that, as a matter of urgency, Chris Woodhead familiarises himself with the evidence available in order to make a more valid contribution to the current debate about the education of the under-fives.



The Early Years Curriculum Group

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now