Settlement on 'strong advice'

19th May 1995 at 01:00
I am extremely reluctant to prolong the correspondence, reference Les Moores ( (TES, April 7) and Rob Prior (TES, April 21), but there is some gross distortion which simply cannot pass unchallenged.

Rob Prior makes the fundamental mistake of asserting that judicial review provides financial relief. It does not. The legal advice we received was to use the declaration in the High Court that the Secretary of State should have directed the governors to act properly to secure compensation from the school. Negotiations and High Court proceedings were opened to that end. Again, the strong advice we received from our lawyers was that the amount offered represented a good out-of-court settlement and was a considerably better prospect than other alternatives which carried very significant risks, full disclosure of which would not be in Rob Prior's interests.

Rob Prior's allegations about the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers' attitude to industrial tribunals and to the defence of members facing redundancy of dismissal is a disgraceful travesty. Space does not allow me to list the scores of successful cases we have pursued.


General secretary


5 King Street, London WC2

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today