'Shoddy' lessons come under fire

5th July 1996 at 01:00
James Montgomery reports on the Institute of Directors' seminar on business and education held in London last week. Primary schools waste too much time on "colouring, pasting and sticking" at the expense of more rigorous learning, chief inspector Chris Woodhead believes.

Renewing his campaign against "intellectually shoddy" teaching, Mr Woodhead told the Institute of Directors' seminar on business and education in London last week that "a lot of children are bored in weak lessons by the monotony of their experience".

He added: "I want to see lessons where there is much more expected of the children, where teachers are teaching in a more active and direct way. I think the fun in going to school is to be stretched, being exposed to things you can go forward with. What I want to see is art that is really exciting and rigorous and developmental."

His remarks angered the National Association of Head Teachers, whose general secretary David Hart described them as "an outrageous attack" and "deeply offensive to primary heads".

"The picture of primary schools that he seeks to paint is pure fantasy and out of touch with the reality of teaching in this day and age. The chief inspector is in danger of entering the political arena to an unacceptable degree and is clearly hell-bent on imposing his own personal agenda in a manner which is distinctly unhealthy for the education system," he said.

Mr Woodhead stressed that the criticism did not apply to all primary teaching - inspections by the Office for Standards in Education suggested about 20 per cent of classes were unsatisfactory.

Yet while there were some outstanding schools, he was aware of "an increasing frustration about the lack of progress that is being made".

He blamed a resistance to change within the educational world which was not used to being held publicly accountable, and an understandable hostility on the part of teachers and educationists to criticism.

Too often, those who should be leading the process of reform from within had the most to lose - they would prefer to turn the clock back.

While there was no evidence of extremely progressive methods in the state sector, Mr Woodhead said many primary teachers still resisted didactic techniques in favour of "liberating the latent potential of the child". While such methods "did not result in children swinging naked from the trees", they "waste time with an excess of colouring, pasting and sticking".

Intellectually shoddy ideas had to be challenged if standards were to improve, Mr Woodhead insisted. Making inspections more supportive, as critics demanded, would simply reveal "the school's own evaluation of itself".

Turning to teacher training, he was worried that courses were not "sufficiently focused and practical". He said: "It is not enough for students to be exposed to the different theories of how children learn to read; they need to be told what works and the way to do it."

The development of a core curriculum for initial teacher training would "expose whatever is woolly and inadequate in those who exert such a profound influence on the teachers of today and tomorrow".

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now