Simple point of law explained

1st December 1995 at 00:00
Graham Clayton, senior solicitor for National Union of Teachers comments that "education legislation has made it impossible to determine whether school governing bodies or local education authorities are teachers' employers"(TES, November 3). I am astonished by his comment that "the two employer problem makes for very complex law". May I suggest that he reads DES Circular 1389. This makes the position crystal clear:

* In a school with financial delegation, when exercising its staffing powers the governing body is the employer, that is hiring and firing. Therefore, it is the first respondents in industrial tribunal cases.

* The LEA is the contract holder who must dismiss or appoint as the case may be once the governing body has made the appropriate determination pursuant to S44 Schedule 3 of 1988 Act. The LEA usually pays the compensation so the LEA is the second respondent in industrial tribunal cases.

However, Mr Clayton is not the only solicitor to have failed to grasp the essence of this very simple point; but in my experience those solicitors work for LEAs not teacher unions.


Adel Leeds

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now