Size of packet not what counts

17th November 2006 at 00:00
The article on the shortage of male teachers ("Endangered: Male Species", TES magazine, November 10) seems to focus on the size of the wage packet and fails to mention one very crucial factor: on the whole, men are slightly more rebellious than women and less likely to accept a straitjacketed approach.

As a member of the endangered species, I can truly say that I love my job and cannot think of any other that would be as fun or rewarding. I am, however, very sceptical about the narrow way in which a school's success is now measured and the plethora of tracking grids and assessment ladders that accompanies this. This, together with some of the more restrictive health and safety regulations, means that many very able men simply feel too constrained, which is a great loss to the profession.

Job satisfaction means more to most people than simply the size of their wage packet.

David Grundy

King's Lynn


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today