Skills for Life scrutinised

10th September 2010 at 01:00

It is encouraging to see that Niace is undertaking an inquiry into the impact of Skills for Life ("We can't go around with people who can't read or write", September 3).

Although Skills for Life was intended to be a strategy to deal with our longstanding adult functional illiteracy and innumeracy problem, it has actually had a rather different focus: those adults who lack level 2 literacy or numeracy skills. So the target audience has been the four in five adults assessed as missing that government benchmark - not those adults who actually have poor reading, writing and number skills. So instead of targetting a realistic five to seven million adults, it has targetted 26 million.

Skills for Life has helped some adults get a qualification. What is less clear is whether it has reduced the number of functionally illiterate and innumerate adults, the very people that Lord Boswell's wife taught in her literacy classes.

Alan Wells, former director of The Basic Skills Agency and specialist adviser to the Moser Committee.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today