Smart ideas?

18th February 2000 at 00:00
ZERAH Colburn, a 19th-century American prodigy, could multiply 12,225 by 1,223 in his head by the age of six. His latter-day equivalent, Justin Chapman, a six-year-old New Yorker, is studying Pharaonic architecture at university.

Neither needed the intelligence-boosting drugs that scientists are trying to develop. The rest of us might, however, be tempted to gulp some down if we thought they could transform us into chess champions who can memorise War and Peace and even programme video-recorders.

Dr Iain Chalmers is therefore right to say we should keep at least one wary eye on the pills that re designed to cure educational ills. But even "smart drugs" may quickly become obsolete. The new consensus is that the techniques that produced Dolly the sheep will soon create "genetically-improved" human beings.

What would that mean for education - and society in general? Exam invigilators could conceivably test candidates for performance-enhancing drugs. But it would be infinitely harder to deal with the ethical problems - and social polarisation - that would ensue if regiments of super-Mensa designer babies began emerging from the labs. Compared to that, smart drugs seem innocuous.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today