Snobbery in attacking undergraduate teacher training

6th March 2009 at 00:00

We were very disappointed with your editorial on the B.Ed, particularly given the wealth of information available about the contribution - in terms of both quality and quantity - that undergraduate teacher education programmes make to teacher supply. Newly qualified teachers, for example, rate them as being extremely effective in preparing them to teach, and they are very popular with schools. They give students more time in school than postgraduate routes and more scope to spend time on key areas such as special educational needs. According to Ofsted, they are of high quality.

At a time when teacher education is under close scrutiny, it is important that public debate is informed by evidence rather than conjecture.

James Noble-Rogers, Executive director, Universties Council for the Education of Teachers, London.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now