Snobbery in attacking undergraduate teacher training

6th March 2009 at 00:00

We were very disappointed with your editorial on the B.Ed, particularly given the wealth of information available about the contribution - in terms of both quality and quantity - that undergraduate teacher education programmes make to teacher supply. Newly qualified teachers, for example, rate them as being extremely effective in preparing them to teach, and they are very popular with schools. They give students more time in school than postgraduate routes and more scope to spend time on key areas such as special educational needs. According to Ofsted, they are of high quality.

At a time when teacher education is under close scrutiny, it is important that public debate is informed by evidence rather than conjecture.

James Noble-Rogers, Executive director, Universties Council for the Education of Teachers, London.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today