Special needs reports 'vague'

5th September 1997 at 01:00
Too many inspectors still tend to regard the school's treatment of pupils with special needs as a bit of an afterthought, according to an analysis of 121 OFSTED reports.

The survey, conducted by the National Association for Special Needs, covered 89 primary, 24 secondary and eight middle schools. One criticism is of the inspectors' tendency to fall back on vague statements unsupported by evidence, such as "pupils with SEN make good progress".

This was the case in 25 per cent of the primary school reports which mentioned SEN in the key findings section. Inspectors also tended to omit SEN pupils when judging the quality of teaching in core subjects.

The report recommends that inspectors become more familiar with the Code of Practice and suggests that reports include a section addressing special needs.

OFSTED Inspection Reports and Special Educational Needs, available from NASEN, 4-5 Amber Business Village, Amber Close, Amington, Tamworth B77 4RP

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now