Spend more, achieve less

11th December 1998 at 00:00
COUNCILS that spend the most on education and have the smallest classes achieve the worst results, according to a new analysis of local authority spending.

The more that is spent per pupil by a local authority, the lower the standards, the Centre for Policy Studies found.

But the report was criticised for taking no account of levels of deprivation in each authority.

Neil Fletcher, head of education at the Local Government Association, said:

"This crude statistical nonsense gives number crunching a bad name."

John Marks, author of the report Value for Money in LEA Schools in 1997, cited Sefton, Bury and York as having the best "value" primary schools. They spent just Pounds 1,490 per pupil while getting more than 70 per cent of 11-year-olds to the required standards in national tests.

In contrast, the London boroughs of Greenwich, Lambeth, and Hammersmith and Fulham, spent more than Pounds 2,420, but the pass rate was 58 per cent, he said.

"It is not just a question of deprivation: child-centred teaching methods are probably an important factor," he said.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today