Spend more, achieve less

11th December 1998 at 00:00
COUNCILS that spend the most on education and have the smallest classes achieve the worst results, according to a new analysis of local authority spending.

The more that is spent per pupil by a local authority, the lower the standards, the Centre for Policy Studies found.

But the report was criticised for taking no account of levels of deprivation in each authority.

Neil Fletcher, head of education at the Local Government Association, said:

"This crude statistical nonsense gives number crunching a bad name."

John Marks, author of the report Value for Money in LEA Schools in 1997, cited Sefton, Bury and York as having the best "value" primary schools. They spent just Pounds 1,490 per pupil while getting more than 70 per cent of 11-year-olds to the required standards in national tests.

In contrast, the London boroughs of Greenwich, Lambeth, and Hammersmith and Fulham, spent more than Pounds 2,420, but the pass rate was 58 per cent, he said.

"It is not just a question of deprivation: child-centred teaching methods are probably an important factor," he said.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now