Spurious attack on grammars

15th June 2001 at 01:00
The unwarranted assumption in your article that "Selection 'leads to lower standards'" (TES, May 25) was based on unsubstantiated claims by Professor David Jesson on work that he has not yet published.

Last year similar premature pronouncements were made by your newspaper and taken up by leading politicians, prior to the publication of Professor Jesson's work.

But Professor Sig Prais, of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, has shown that Professor Jesson's data actually proves the opposite o what he had claimed - ie grammar schools do add more value to the top ability group than comprehensives.

Professor Jesson agreed with this and accepted there was no statistical basis for his conclusions.

So to print more unsubstantiated and contentious statements on unpublished work is perverse in the extreme. Where is the balanced reporting your readers expect?

John Harris

Vice-chairman

National Grammar Schools Association, PO Box 7621

Oldbury, West Midlands


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now