Spurious attack on grammars

15th June 2001 at 01:00
The unwarranted assumption in your article that "Selection 'leads to lower standards'" (TES, May 25) was based on unsubstantiated claims by Professor David Jesson on work that he has not yet published.

Last year similar premature pronouncements were made by your newspaper and taken up by leading politicians, prior to the publication of Professor Jesson's work.

But Professor Sig Prais, of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, has shown that Professor Jesson's data actually proves the opposite o what he had claimed - ie grammar schools do add more value to the top ability group than comprehensives.

Professor Jesson agreed with this and accepted there was no statistical basis for his conclusions.

So to print more unsubstantiated and contentious statements on unpublished work is perverse in the extreme. Where is the balanced reporting your readers expect?

John Harris


National Grammar Schools Association, PO Box 7621

Oldbury, West Midlands

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today