Subjects? Yes, but give schools freedom

25th July 2008 at 01:00

Martin Roberts (Letters, July 18) thinks I want to get rid of school subjects. Like much of the right wing press recently and, surprisingly, your newspaper (TES, July 11), he has got me wrong. Believe it or not, I do think schools should have to teach science, history etc. My objection is not to subjects, but to a certain kind of curriculum planning. This has its origin in a list of subjects. The curricula of 1904 and 1988 are examples.

Governments should start their planning farther back, with a detailed and defensible set of educational aims. We need to leave schools free to pursue these, whether by subjects, projects, themes or other vehicles. At national level we also need a mechanism to protect aims from ministerial meddling.

All of us, not least parents and children, have the right to know what schools are ultimately there for.

One day soon, I hope, we shall find out.

John White, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Education, Institute of Education, University of London.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today