Super heads can work wonders

5th March 2010 at 00:00

There is much to be applauded in last week's report of the Science and Learning Expert Group.

However, I feel the report is not explicit enough in its recognition of the damage done to the education of future scientists by the Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency and its relentless deluge of "guidance", much of which is unsupported by evidence as to its efficacy.

At key stage 3, the science curriculum is now to be assessed by a hugely bureaucratic tick-box matrix of around 100 statements relating to such things as evidence and communication skills, with vague injunctions to teachers to choose whatever bits of science best generate evidence of pupil progress in each skill.

In the context of the above, the outbreaks of sanity reported in The TES last week - including Professor Barker's article - are very refreshing!

Andrew Urwin, Head of science, Park Community School, Barnstaple.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now