Tables reduce multiplication of effort

21st February 1997 at 00:00
Further to the letter from Peter Critchley (TES, February 7), surely addition and multiplication are commutative. Therefore 4+3 could be seen as an operation applied to the 4 or the 3, since the outcome is not affected.

If the multiplication was 1x24, then one is not going to treat it as "1 repeated 24 times", merely "1 lot of 24".

Since 4 and 3 are consecutive, one could view them as "4 lots of 3" or "3 lots of 4" with almost equal "effort", but with 5x3 or 3x5, surely one would use the 5 times table regardless of which was asked for - i.e. 5, 10, 15 and not 3, 6, 9, 12, 15?


23 Chaucer Way Wokingham Berkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today