Off target;Jotter

8th May 1998 at 01:00
We hope the following extract from HMI guidance to education authorities on the targets makes the position perfectly clear: "In a number of cases figures in the benchmarking data may not seem to be fully consistent. For example, the starting level may not appear to be the exact average of the years' attainment 1995-97 shown elsewhere or the increase sought may not correspond exactly to the difference between the starting level and the provisional target.

"All such cases are caused by the effects of rounding. Except for the targets for Standard grade English and mathematics (1-6), figures are shown to the nearest whole number percentages.

"For example, a school might have an exact starting level of 20.6 per cent and a target of 30.4 per cent, a difference of 9.8 per cent. Taken to the nearest percentage this would be shown as going from 21 per cent to 30 per cent, difference 10 per cent. In such cases the definitive figure should be taken as the value of the provisional target, in this case 30 per cent, not the 31 per cent that would be obtained by adding the increase sought, 10 per cent, to the starting level, 21 per cent" There must be a maths exam question in there somewhere.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today