Teachers can whip the curriculum back into shape

14th March 2003 at 00:00
IN 2001, the Government asserted that it had "sorted out" primary schools, and that the agenda was now about secondary education. This was seriously misguided and gave support to the view of primary school leaders that their sector was being neglected.

Although the Government's "Investment for Reform" document outlined a commitment to a broad and varied curriculum, an enhanced take-up of sporting opportunities and access to modern foreign languages, the reality is that many schools have experienced a narrowing of the curriculum.

The target-setting agenda is getting out of hand, with heads being severely lent on by local education authorities to set ever-more challenging targets. The target-setting process is distorting the curriculum.

There appears to be no joined-up thinking at government level. The Government's 14-19 policy, and its paper on transforming secondary education, received a positive response. But there is still an urgent need for a strategy for primary education.

Such a strategy must do more than take account of the complaints about targets and performance tables. It needs to produce a genuinely broad and balanced curriculum. Certainly, literacy and numeracy should be at the core. But teachers should have more professional control over how it is taught. Effective transition to secondary school must become a reality everywhere. The current testing and assessment system is in dire need of an overhaul. National tests at seven are undesirable; instead, teacher assessment should be given real weight across both key stages. Policies to address the gifted and talented are needed. Primary schools deserve a fair crack of the whip when it comes to funding for ICT and e-learning credits.

Time to focus on the quality of teaching and learning would result from the Workload Reduction Agreement if the resources were to be genuinely available.

Primary education is at a crossroads. School leaders and their staffs have moved mountains to raise standards. But "more of the same" from the national strategies will not deliver better results. Excessive national and local prescription must be replaced by professional autonomy tied to suitable accountability. Only a new primary strategy, backed by proper resources, will achieve higher standards.

David Hart is general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today