Testing times

19th January 2007 at 00:00
"If at first you don't succeed, test and test again" (TES, January 12) seems to be the Government's prescription for its own lack of progress as well as for learners. But its proposals do offer the chance of genuine personalised assessment and accountability to parents without unduly distorting learning and teaching, provided - and here's the nub - that summations of these more personalised assessments are not used to judge the quality of whole schools. Quality should be made public, but through a reformed school inspection system.

As a critic, I admit that the Government seems to be "making progress", but it must still take the extra step of decoupling individual assessment data from whole-school accountability. Taking it would be a "giant step", if not "for mankind" then at least for personalised education in England.

Professor Colin Richards

Spark Bridge,


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now