Tests must get real

7th May 2010 at 01:00

Your contributors ("Doubtful on the wisdom of a shift to `functional' skills", Letters, April 23), are defending badly flawed qualifications.

High success rates are of little value if the assessments are unrealistic. This is the case in adult literacy and numeracy tests as they consist entirely of multiple choice questions. The most glaring problem with this is that a level 1 or 2 literacy qualification can be gained without writing a word. Another problem is the pass marks, which can be in the very low 20s for a 40-question test.

Functional Skills is an attempt to produce more credible qualifications which test meaningful skills. Candidates will be expected to tackle purposeful tasks in real-life contexts, and the answers will be open response. If the requirement for them to write means success rates fall, then at least we will have a true picture of the challenges.

The idea that young people leaving school should continue to study "basic" skills and concepts risks holding them back unnecessarily.

John Linfoot, Bournemouth.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today