There's clearly no merit in it

12th March 2004 at 00:00
Now that Ted Wragg's University of Exeter report on the impact of performance-related pay (PRP) on schools is about to be published, with its totally expected findings, isn't it time to press the Department for Education and Skills on the actual costs of introducing the whole shambolic caravanserai?

Having endured, as a head, the introduction of PRP and the negative impact it had on staff morale - not to mention the personal stress levels of everyone concerned - it is indeed heartening to note that it has had no impact on teaching whatsoever except that some teachers, in schools which obviously were not running their own successful training programmes, were able to go on a few courses.

Would it not have been better, and infinitely cheaper, to introduce three more points on the pay scale with automatic biennial progression, unless a teacher is already on competence or disciplinary proceedings.

Oh, I forgot, that's what we ended up with anyway!

Robert Newton (Retired headteacher) 5 Netherdale Close Sutton Coldfield

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now