They said ..

7th March 2008 at 00:00
'pound;3.1 billion flagship project to help deprived families is failing to meet even half of its targets.' - The Independent

We say ...

There are three problems here. The first is simple mathematics. Sure Start, the Government's programme to help disadvantaged 3 and 4-year-olds, is judged against 14 indicators and has seen an improvement in seven of these. So, contrary to The Independent report, it has met half of these.

Second, and more pedantically, they are indicators, not targets - there is not a set percentage or date by which they must improve to qualify as hitting or missing.

The final issue is one of practicality. Two of the indicators that have not improved - maternal smoking and maternal weight - are long-term goals. It was never anticipated that these would be achieved in a few years, so they cannot strictly be deemed a failure.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today