They said ..

7th March 2008 at 00:00
'pound;3.1 billion flagship project to help deprived families is failing to meet even half of its targets.' - The Independent

We say ...

There are three problems here. The first is simple mathematics. Sure Start, the Government's programme to help disadvantaged 3 and 4-year-olds, is judged against 14 indicators and has seen an improvement in seven of these. So, contrary to The Independent report, it has met half of these.

Second, and more pedantically, they are indicators, not targets - there is not a set percentage or date by which they must improve to qualify as hitting or missing.

The final issue is one of practicality. Two of the indicators that have not improved - maternal smoking and maternal weight - are long-term goals. It was never anticipated that these would be achieved in a few years, so they cannot strictly be deemed a failure.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now