Time has made reform pointless

12th March 2004 at 00:00
Ruth Silver argues (TES, February 27) that we have waited 10 years for Tomlinson and we should therefore grasp this best hope for A-level reform.

But it is precisely because we have waited so long that this curricular reform is now too late.

During the past decade a highly selective system has consolidated so that 14-plus students now follow either academic, vocational or basic skills pathways through to sixth form in school or college, technical Centres of Vocational Excellence or general FE colleges, then on to researching, teaching or training universities. To overlay this new tertiary tripartism with a Scottish Higher-style baccalaureate will only mask its reality.

Just as curricular reform should have accompanied the structural reform of selective secondary schooling but didn't until the introduction of GCSEs in 1986, so today it is too late for curricular reform now that schools, FE and HE select atevery level.

Patrick Ainley, Professor of education and training

University of Greenwich

41 Vaughan Gardens

Ilford, Essex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today