Time to stop complaining about tendering costs

6th June 1997 at 01:00
Your report on the privatisation of careers services did little more than repeat a series of subjective judgments about the impact of privatisation (TES, May 23). While I am sure the Government will want to take a more objective look at the quality of provision, the impression created by your report should not go unchallenged.

First, the careers service has not been provided by companies since 1993. That was the date when a rolling programme began whereby all services were subjected to competitive tender. A substantial proportion only started work in April 1996. While it may be premature to judge the success or failure of individual suppliers, the general picture, in terms of increased and quantifiable efficiency, is encouraging.

There are good reasons for criticising the contracting-out process, but not because it introduced competitive tendering. Indeed, the shortcoming in the process was that there was far too little competition with, in the earlier stages, incumbents getting contracts without external challenge. And it really is time that these complaints about the cost of tendering were dismissed. For any competent company, tendering is a highly creative learning process. It imposes on you the requirements to assess what you do and why and how you do it. Even when we lose, the Centre for British Teachers (CfBT) generally concludes that tendering has been a worthwhile investment.

You report that ministers are being told that privatisation has disrupted links between careers work and the education service. "Service", in this case, can only mean bureaucracy. There has certainly been no diminution in links with schools or further education colleges where education actually takes place.

The argument that local accountabilityrepresentation has been lost is spurious. I have dealt with eight local education authorities where the CfBT has been taking over services. I have met chief education officers who understood the careers service and others who not only did not understand it but thought that it should be done away with and integrated into schools.

In only one of those LEAs was there a careers sub-committee of the education committee. I have yet to meet a local councillor who had any real knowledge of the careers service.

Of course, it is important to get the views of local partners, and the Department for Education and Employment rightly requires us to spell out how we are going to do that. The idea that the only way is through local steering committees and consultative bodies, which many local employers dismiss as talking shops, is amazingly unimaginative.


Chief executive CfBT Education Services 1 The Chambers East Street Reading, Berkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today