Too-safe science

26th January 2001 at 00:00
Are strange smells and small-scale explosions becoming endangered species in school science labs?

Evidence presented to a Lords committee strongly suggests that teachers' fear of ending up in court means pupils are doing less hands-on experimentation. Dissections - no longer compulsory on any syllabus - are increasingly unlikely, given animal rights sensitivities.

The result is that the inspiring bits of the subject - which might transform a bored, spotty 13-year-old into an aspiring scientist - are disappearing. Watching your teacher do an experiment is all very well, but doesn't even remotely compare with the un of doing it yourself.

English 14-year-olds are good at science: they recently came ninth in an international survey. Researchers noted their lessons contained more practicals than elsewhere.

The Association for Science Education is campaigning for the curriculum to be more relevant to real 21st-century science. And it wants health and safety regulations to differentiate more between school labs and giant chemical conglomerates.

Schools need everyone's support in this: being over-cautious is a safe option in these litigious days. But we can't risk turning off a single potential young scientist.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today