Unlike Kent, I like the 'bleedin' obvious'

3rd December 2010 at 00:00

I don't usually take issue with Mike Kent, but I cannot agree with his portrayal of assessment for learning ("'Expert' theories are all very well ...", November 26).

Far from being a theory removed from the classroom, it is based on action research undertaken by teachers in class. He also misses the point about using lolly sticks instead of hands up. Instead of the teacher asking a recall question and then getting an answer from a child with their hand up, better to ask a question that provokes discussion with a talking partner and then choose randomly who answers. That way everyone participates.

When we introduced assessment for learning techniques into our classrooms, the children didn't like random talking partners, they weren't used to "no hands up" and it took time to develop their peer- and self-assessment skills. But by the end of the year, the children told us how much they valued the new way of doing things.

Mr Kent may be right that these things are "bleedin' obvious", but I'm glad I had them pointed out to me.

Grant Strudley, Primary school teacher, Berkshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today