Unqualified doesn't mean second-rate

1st November 2013 at 00:00

Is it not time to have a grown-up discussion about unqualified teachers? I joined further education as an unqualified teacher and went on to take a Certificate in Education. The course was interesting but did little to help me teach - lesson and peer observations provided the most insight. An inspirational textbook A Guide to Student-Centred Learning by Donna Brandes and Paul Ginnis also gave me ideas.

Later, as an inspector of work-based learning for England's schools inspectorate Ofsted, I saw some truly great teaching from people who had no training whatsoever. What they did have were excellent communication skills, the ability to engage their students and a passion for, and up-to-date knowledge of, their subject.

Can we at least acknowledge that a degree and a one-year postgraduate certificate in education course does not automatically make a good teacher, and that some unqualified teachers can knock spots off some qualified ones?

Sally Butler, Lostwithiel, Cornwall.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now