Unsatisfactory explanation

28th February 2003 at 00:00
The chief inspector's defence of his assertion that "satisfactory" means "unsatisfactory" is unconvincing.

We should insist that "satisfactory" means just what it says. It is what can legitimately be expected of a teacher in any particular lesson, given the demands on his or her time, energy and imaginative capacities in the typical school week.

We should reject the Office for Standards in Education's condescending interpretation of the term. As more lessons have been judged by Ofsted to be "satisfactory or better", so the demands have been ratcheted up.

How long before "good" is the new "satisfactory" and we are told that just being "good" is no longer good enough; only "excellence" will now suffice?

Mrs V Clark

34 Vicarage Drive


East Sussex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today