Violent threat to the past

17th September 1999 at 01:00
Historians fear that a too narrow study of this century's dictators is restricting the knowledge of pupils. Sarah Cassidy reports

THE EDUCATIONAL market place has reduced history to the study of 20th-century violence and oppression, according to Britain's leading historians.

Children are repeatedly taught about the atrocities of Hitler and Stalin but know little of life before 1900, teachers and academics asserted at this week's Historical Association conference.

They are concerned that commercial pressures will force exam boards to drop earlier periods of study, reducing the opportunities for future historians to gain a comprehensive knowledge of their

subject.

They fear a repeat of this summer's axing of Anglo-Saxon history, which was dropped by all exam boards because it was considered too unpopular, and only reinstated after the personal intervention of the Education Secretary David Blunkett.

Although fewer students answer exam questions on earlier periods, this does not mean they are not interested in pre-20th century, just that many have not been taught it, historians argued at the York University conference.

Sean Lang, head of sixth form at Hills Road sixth-form college in Cambridge, is horrified by the almost exclusive focus on 20th-

century dictators.

"Why do we feel that the best way of selling our subject is by promoting violence and tyranny. The diet we are in danger of cooking up seems to be designed exclusively to appeal to teenagers. We must challenge the assumption that violence is attractive and offer our students a less narrow curriculum," he said.

Rosamund McKitterick, professor of medieval history at Cambridge University, added: "Students' knowledge is becoming worryingly narrow. It is not uncommon for students to come to university with little sense of history before the 18th century having studied only tyranny and oppression.

"Students do not always know what is best for them - encouraging them to widen their horizons can only be beneficial."

Exam boards came under fire for dropping earlier periods from the syllabuses currently being prepared for the new modular

A-levels which start in September 2000.

But the boards blamed the Government's exam quango, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, for enforcing strict limits on syllabus numbers which will allow only 135 from the year 2000.

Opinion, 16

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a TES/ TESS subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today