Vocational dice are loaded

30th July 2004 at 01:00
Having recently taken up employment in an 11-16 school after a number of years working in further education, I am appalled by the bias against vocational education that seems to permeate all aspects of secondary-school culture.

Almost without exception pupils are encouraged to pursue "academic" subjects up to and beyond the age of 16. The only exception to this seems to be in the case of learners who exhibit "challenging" behaviour andor those who are deemed incapable of contributing to the school's performance in terms of pupils' attainment of five A*-C GCSE grades.

In my opinion - and I am backed here by the findings of an MPhil thesis which I have almost finished writing - key stage 4 is awash with pupils who are disengaged from learning, not through lack of ability but through lack of interest in the classroom-based paradigm perpetuated by our school system.

These pupils often have an entirely different - and more positive - attitude to work placements and the limited opportunities they get for hands-on learning.

There is also a chronic lack of momentum in work-based initiatives that is exacerbated by business leaders. I am astounded by the lack of involvement in my area (Essex and east London) of business sectors which are faced with dreadful skills shortages but which are still not pushing the system to drive through the changes that could have a huge impact on such problems.

One simple example is the building industry, which has a shortage of the skills required to build the thousands of new homes needed in the South-east.

It would be a reasonably straightforward process to spend a little time in schools to seek out those pupils who persistently under-perform in the current system but who have an interest and potential ability in particular vocational areas.

Surely it would be equally simple to set up a pilot scheme driven by industry to subsidise a group of pre-16 pupils through day release with an FE provider, and to offer high-quality work placements for another day per week.

Perhaps such schemes already exist, although I have seen very little evidence of them.

If anyone out there is interested in setting up such a tripartite pilot scheme, I would love to hear from them.

David Hann

6 Burntwood

Brentwood, Essex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today